Do you still eat foods with “trans fats”?
People living in areas that restrict trans fats in foods had fewer hospitalizations for heart attack and stroke compared to residents in areas without restrictions, according to a study led by a Yale researcher. This finding suggests the benefit of limiting trans fats could have widespread impact as trans fat restrictions are set to expand nationwide.
The study was published April 12 in JAMA Cardiology.
Trans fatty acids, or trans fats, are commonly found in foods such as chips, crackers, fried foods, and baked goods. Minimal amounts of trans fat intake are linked to greater risk of cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death worldwide. In recent years, localities like New York City enacted policies to reduce trans fats in restaurants and other eateries. In 2018, an FDA ban on partially hydrogenated oil in foods, which will nearly eliminate dietary trans fat, takes effect nationwide.
To study the impact of restricting trans fats, Dr. Eric Brandt and his co-authors compared outcomes for people living in New York counties with and without the restrictions. Using data from the state department of health and census estimates between 2002 and 2013, the researchers focused on hospital admissions for heart attack and stroke.
They found that three or more years after the restrictions were implemented, people living in areas with restrictions had significantly fewer hospitalizations for heart attack and stroke based on trends in similarly urban areas without the restrictions. The decline for the combined conditions was 6.2%.
“It is a pretty substantial decline,” said Brandt, a clinical fellow in cardiovascular medicine at Yale School of Medicine. “Our study highlights the power of public policy to impact the cardiovascular health of a population. Trans fats are deleterious for cardiovascular health, and minimizing or eliminating them from the diet can substantially reduce rates of heart attack and stroke.”
The study results point to the possibility of much more widespread benefit as the FDA’s measure — which restricts trans fats in all food — are due to take effect in 2018, said Brandt.
“Even though some companies have reduced the amount of trans fat in food, current FDA labeling guidelines allow up to 0.49 grams of trans fat per serving to be labeled as 0 grams, leaving consumers to scour labels for hidden trans fats, usually labeled as partially hydrogenated oils. With the upcoming FDA regulation, people need not be so vigilant. A nationwide trans fat ban is a win for the millions of people at risk for cardiovascular disease,” he said.
Other study authors are Rebecca Myerson, Marcelo Coca Perraillon, and Tamar S. Polonsky.
This research was supported by the American Medical Association Seed Grant Research Program and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health.
Article from – Yale
Cathy Bowers, RD
www.nutritionforalifetime.biz
Recent Posts
- Tips for Meal Planning on a Budget
- The 3,500 Calorie per Pound Rule Is Wrong
- Never Too Late to Start Eating Healthier
- The Actual Benefit of Diet vs. Drugs
- Why Is Meat a Risk Factor for Diabetes?
Recent Comments
- Cathy Bowers on The 3,500 Calorie per Pound Rule Is Wrong
- Jack on The 3,500 Calorie per Pound Rule Is Wrong
- Cathy Bowers on Top 5 Herbs and Spices
- Jeannine Bennett on Top 5 Herbs and Spices
- Health Benefits of Herbs on One of my “FAVORITE” snacks!
Archives
- September 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
Categories
Meta
Recent Posts
- Tips for Meal Planning on a Budget
- The 3,500 Calorie per Pound Rule Is Wrong
- Never Too Late to Start Eating Healthier
- The Actual Benefit of Diet vs. Drugs
- Why Is Meat a Risk Factor for Diabetes?
Recent Comments
- Cathy Bowers on The 3,500 Calorie per Pound Rule Is Wrong
- Jack on The 3,500 Calorie per Pound Rule Is Wrong
- Cathy Bowers on Top 5 Herbs and Spices
- Jeannine Bennett on Top 5 Herbs and Spices
- Health Benefits of Herbs on One of my “FAVORITE” snacks!
Archives
- September 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016